| 2026/05 | LEM Working Paper Series | ||||||||||||||||
|
Are All Low-Wage Workers Alike? Heterogeneity in the Post-Pandemic U.S. Labor Market |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Caterina Manicardi, Aritra Basu and Anamika Sen |
|||||||||||||||||
| Keywords | |||||||||||||||||
|
Covid-19, Occupational Segregation, Job Mobility, Labor Market Tightness
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JEL Classifications | |||||||||||||||||
|
J30, J63, I18
|
|||||||||||||||||
| Abstract | |||||||||||||||||
|
This paper analyzes heterogeneity in post-pandemic labor market adjustment across
industries, contrasting healthcare and social assistance with leisure and hospitality.
Using CPS monthly microdata (2015-2023), JOLTS separations, and LEHD Jobto-
Job flows, we estimate sector-specific wage-separation elasticities, demographicgroup-
specific wage Phillips curves and link labor market tightness to wage growth
and employer-to-employer mobility. Both sectors experienced significant increases
in quit rates after 2020, however, the underlying drivers are markedly different.
Leisure and hospitality workers showed substantial upward mobility across industry
wage-premium quartiles and frequent exits to other sectors, consistent with
improved outside options in a tight labor market. Conversely, healthcare and social
assistance workers displayed limited outward mobility, higher rates of within industry
job downgrades, and separation elasticities that weakened further after
Covid-19. These dynamics align with well-documented structural features of care
industries -credential-based occupational closure, a disproportionately female and
older workforce, and pandemic-induced deterioration in working conditions. Our
findings suggest that wage compression disproportionately benefited mobile male
workers in low-wage jobs outside the care sector, while quits in healthcare reflect
non-wage factors and degraded working conditions.
|
Downloads
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||