2022/37 | LEM Working Paper Series | ||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
Wages and productivity in Argentinian manufacturing. A structuralist and distributional firm-level analysis |
|||||||||||||||||
Maria Celeste Gomez and Maria Enrica Virgillito |
|||||||||||||||||
Keywords | |||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
Gains from productivity; Development; Asymmetries.
|
|||||||||||||||||
JEL Classifications | |||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
J31 , D24, L6, O14, C21
|
|||||||||||||||||
Abstract | |||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
Wages and productivity represent two of the most relevant variables to consider in economic development. Given
the low productivity levels that emerging countries reveal, the accumulation of productive capabilities and a
narrower dispersion across sectors would enable emerging countries to overcome the middle-income trap. Yet, this
positive trend in productivity should translate into higher wages. Thus, we pose the following questions applied to
a middle-income trapped country: is there a link between labour productivity and wages in the Argentine
manufacturing sector? Does it differ across techno-productive classes or wage levels? Which factors affect this
nexus, considering premature deindustrialisation? Using a firm-level dataset from 2010 to 2016, we perform
quantile regression estimates to evaluate the link between productivity and wages across the conditional wage
distribution among manufacturing firms. Based on a structural analysis, we identify the differences in these
elasticities at 2-ISIC code levels and across Pavitt taxonomies. Our results confirm a positive, but extremely low,
pass-through between productivity and wages in the Argentinian manufacturing firms, different across sectors
according to their techno-productive capabilities, robust under different empirical strategies.
|
Downloads
|
![]() ![]() |
|
![]()
|
![]() |