2018/05 | LEM Working Paper Series | ||||||||||||||||
Collateral Unchained: Rehypothecation networks, concentration and systemic effects |
|||||||||||||||||
Duc Thi Luu, Mauro Napoletano, Paolo Barucca and Stefano Battiston |
|||||||||||||||||
Keywords | |||||||||||||||||
Rehypothecation, Collateral, Repo Contracts, Networks, Liquidity, Collateral-Hoarding Effects, Systemic Risk.
|
|||||||||||||||||
JEL Classifications | |||||||||||||||||
G01, G11, G32, G33
|
|||||||||||||||||
Abstract | |||||||||||||||||
We study how network structure affects the dynamics of collateral in
presence of rehypothecation. We build a simple model wherein banks
interact via chains of repo contracts and use their proprietary
collateral or re-use the collateral obtained by other banks via
reverse repos. In this framework, we show that total collateral volume
and its velocity are affected by characteristics of the network like
the length of rehypothecation chains, the presence or not of chains
having a cyclic structure, the direction of collateral flows, the
density of the network. In addition, we show that structures where
collateral flows are concentrated among few nodes (like in
core-periphery networks) allow large increases in collateral volumes
already with small network density. Furthermore, we introduce in the
model collateral hoarding rates determined according to a
Value-at-Risk (VaR) criterion, and we then study the emergence of
collateral hoarding cascades in different networks. Our results
highlight that network structures with highly concentrated collateral
flows are also more exposed to large collateral hoarding cascades
following local shocks. These networks are therefore characterized by
a trade-off between liquidity and systemic risk.
|
Downloads
|
|
| |
|
Back
|
|